Monday, October 18, 2010

A chance to shine

Given that majority of the class has done poorly on the midterm, the professor was kind enough to let us assess the crisis on our own and implement a new game plan on how we may improve the current grade and generate better ones on exams to come. Day in and day out we come to class as students, and abide the rules given to us by the managerial figure placed in front of us "the professor", this time we were given the chance to be managers of ourselves and the class, as the professor sat back and watched, with an occasional grim. Its well known that saying "lets just study harder" will only end us in the same place so here we were on the track to raise our grade. Automatically the class had split into the aggressors who didn't yet know what they wanted but were eager to be "self-nominated" leaders. The brown nosers, who although were given a leadership position were still intimidated by the presence of the professor in the room and felt as if they would prosper more through a humble approach. And as few such as myself, at the moment I felt like a high roller, the chance was mine to finally take advantage and hustle the "system". Chaos erupted as the professor said go, and ideas were being hollered out. A classmate, Abe, decided to address this by approaching the board and jotting down ideas. Winning over the majority but there were still a few that were dazed and confused. We finally agreed how we will improve our grade, and with just a few minutes to spare we went into the debate of formatting the next exam. People were all over the place, opposing ideas, and suggesting ideas of the same nature. i.e. Yes to multiple/multiple but no to True/False... Go on E-bay buy a CLUE. Others were to eager to explain that giving a curve to those that did worse then them would be like giving a reward for the lack of effort. I felt like I started out as a "compete to win" participator and walked away as a collaborating player. I was eager to take advantage, yell out high numbers for extra credit and settle on something in between, yet there were those who low balled themselves. Automatically agreeing on a 10% increase for extra credit is not justifiable when you're in charge, 20 should of been offered and on 15 we should of closed. As we approached the "closing bell" final decisions had to be locked in, and a unanimous vote must of been agreed upon to received the bundle that will raise our grade. To this minute I think there are still some people who don't know what they agreed to, but knew that they would be the black sheep out, if no vote was put in. Overall I am happy with the final outcome, not every professor will give this opportunity, if given again, I think people just need to know how to play their cards right, and appreciate the fact that your in charge. We don't feel guilty taking advantage of low mrtgs, or sales, yet when it comes to student/professor ethics, even when given power, some choose to be weak.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with what you said about the low balling. We definitely could have tried bargaining for more points and instead of just settling for 10 which was one of the first numbers thrown out. I feel that many of us are not used to being put in a situation where the professor gives us the opportunity to choose how many points we will receive and it was a totally new idea. If there is to be a next time, we should try to go as high as we can and go down from there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have to agree that it was really chaotic & the communication gap kind of grew so some people just didn't know what was going on, or they wanted to be absolutely sure of how their grades would be affected & didn't want to agree otherwise. Which I don't blame them for; if my grade was on the line and I wasn't participating in the decision making process, I would want someone to tell me exactly how I would be affected. I do agree that there were some people in the class that had absolutely no logic or reasoning what so ever. For instance someone didn't understand that we get partial credit on multiple-multiple and that an MC Ques can be structured as a T/F Ques. Regardless of the fact, we didn't have time to explain calculus to someone who can't pass algebra, so to speak. But I wouldn't say a lot of people fell in to this category. As for the extra credit, you're right in the fact that we could have bargained for more points, but if I recall correctly, it wasn't so much of an issue of bargaining, because he said he would go higher but the stipulation was that if we asked for 20 points, he would make it a harder and longer paper. Although I would have loved to make the trade off between more points and more work, a lot of people didn't want to take that on. That's something to take in to consideration when we have a limited amount of time to make 40 people agree on a decision. I don't think that would have been an efficient use of time and we did well compromising on a middle ground.

    I read the decision making and organizational structure chapters (4 and 8) about 2 weeks in advance so as we were going through the process, I did notice that we were pretty on point (for a class that didn't have a lecture on that chapter yet). This may be an explanation for our success in obtaining a unanimous vote & avoiding as much chaos as his other class did. You have to agree that we weren't too disorganized ... and we were pretty efficient/effective in how we went about it.

    ReplyDelete